For the greater good, in the name of people’s security, for our democracy, for our national sovereignty, against imperialism and other famous mottos, they are nothing more than powerful slogans historically used to unite people and justify actions of a small group of people who cover up dubious moral and ethical actions relegated even by those who shouldn’t relegate them. Again, we need to have a critical view to go beyond inflammatory speeches to find out who really benefits from these actions.

And these fiery speeches now deal with the regulation of social networks, which seems to be the new #1 enemy of national sovereignty or, more dramatically, of the poor citizen who cannot defend himself. With this “threat”, bureaucrats choose to protect people by limiting access to information with criteria defined by themselves.

But limiting any access to information is limiting someone’s freedom of choice, which is perhaps our greatest individual right. Each of us must be responsible for defining what to see/read/listen to and what not, according to our conscience and must have the opportunity to develop ourselves with our own choices.

I repeat once again, it is important to know who controls the censors, who are mere bureaucratic puppets, to understand the movement that is taking place and discover the real small tyrant group that wants to control us and who is raising their voice against it.